AUSSIE ALLIANCE – Beating The Uni Party Without Giving Up Independent Ideals
By Jeanine Bird
Aussies need something new, politically speaking, but how to get the smaller parties to play ball in the national interest??
It’s not rocket science, but I came up with this some years ago and have offered it to a few political movers and shakers, but egos get in the way every time: the shattering of the conservative vote being the consequence. We’re seeing it again in the current South Austalian election as reported in Cairns News. Both in this and the Farrer by-election, Matt Canavan has been getting supporters offside by attacking One Nation instead of aligning on what matters and attacking the real culprits.
How can we snub the preferential system that was designed to give us further preferences —should our first preference not get up, then our vote went further down the line to our 2nd or third preference? This is a very fair system, except that “parties” were formed, so then the major political parties get to make the rules and corrupt it. They’ve done this on several occasions, corrupting it to the point that in our two-party preferred system, Aussies voting independently virtually have to eventually vote for the majors, even if they’re last on the ballot (eg. where you must number EVERY box for compulsory preferential voting).
How can the smaller parties overcome this to beat the big bully-boy Uniparty without giving up their ideals?
An Aussie Alliance might be a way for smaller parties to work together, yet keep their own identity to a large extent. They must agree on core policies, which many of them do, and they must agree on a loose coalition – the Aussie Alliance.
Once agreeing to the core policies, in every electorate, individual parties go through their processes, and choose a candidate. Once chosen, there must be a meeting of all parties and candidates, and the parties and candidates sell themselves to the wider group, eventually “electing” ONE of the candidates from the Alliance to contest that electorate. All the others get behind that candidate, warts and all, and work to get that person elected.
Ultimately, aside from generally throwing up the best candidate, all put their energy, finances and manpower towards getting the Alliance’s candidate elected, and giving the people who might normally vote for one of the smaller parties an option which would very likely raise a candidate of their choice, or very close to one they would choose, to electable status …. in that they would have a very good chance of beating the majors/Uniparty. (In some cases, it may be decided to support two candidates to harvest preferences, but all the minor parties contesting that electorate would be in support.)
This would mean, of course, that say One Nation would have a strong candidate in one electorate, but support for example, a Katter, UAP, People First or Australia One candidate in the electorate next door.
EVERYONE would know that this was going on, and all would be sacrificing their points of difference to an extent, but FOR THE NATION’S FUTURE. This has been trashed by the majors and their junior coalition partners and hangers-on by signing away Australia’s future, eroding our economic viability, and stealing the productive capacity of our great nation, which is capable of so much more without their corruption and genuflection to the globalists.
The question is of course, will the leaders of the smaller parties surrender their egos to support this, or continue to run shotgun independently without gaining real ground which might be available to them if they worked together in this fashion?
I believe we need to think outside the box if we’re ever to regain our sovereignty and freedoms eroded and stolen from under our noses while we slept. ANZAC Day reminds us of sacrifices our men made fighting against the loss of these things, although they did not at the time realise that both sides were financed by the same people in their bloody quest for global control.
What can YOU do for Australia in recognition of their sacrifices, yet understanding those financiers taking control through the UN, WEF, central banksters etc?
You can think outside the electoral box, because if we don’t, then we will continue to be controlled by the globalist money-men and their sycophantic minions.
